Photocopies and other reproductions in exhibits
Based on an article by Norman Banfield
1. The Problem
An exhibit is required to “consist solely of relevant
philatelic material, supporting documentation and text, other than in an Open class”
[GREV, Article 3.1]. With modern photocopying techniques, copies can look as good as the
originals. Thus, it would be possible to include colour copies in an exhibit when the
exhibitor does not own the original. Quality is so good it can be very difficult to
identify a copy when mounted like original covers on a matte and seen through a
protector and the frame.
For example, some exhibitors have been found to have downloaded a picture from a
website and printed it in colour on good quality paper so that it looks like an
original postcard. This is not an original of a picture the exhibitor owns and
it should only be used where it is clearly identified as a copy and the size reduced
appropriately.
2. Solutions
The main point on reproductions is THEY MUST NOT BE CONFUSED
with original material. It is absolutely critical the reproduction is clearly
differentiated.
Differentiation by description
One solution is to clearly identify the reproduction with a statement in a smaller or
different font from that used for the body of the exhibit.
Differentiation in size of copies
Some of the present rules in SREVs and Guidelines refer specifically to colour
photographs, photocopies or reproductions being at least 25% different in size -
i.e. reduced to 75% or less or enlarged to 125% or more. A black and white copy
may obviously be a copy but a coloured copy needs to follow the “at least 25%
different” rule.
Differentiation by mounting
Another suggestion is to use a different mounting method such as a border around a scan.
But, beware not to confuse this method with any used to highlight important or
rare items.
Title pages
It may be appropriate to state on the title page how reproductions are identified, such
as: “Where reproductions of material are required to assist the exhibit development,
these are clearly identified with smaller text font and a thin black border.”
3. Guidelines for
addressing the problem
Where there are specific rules they state “25% different in
size”. This means reduced to 75% or less or enlarged to 125% or more but not in between.
To avoid problems and loss of points, it is suggested:
- when showing a copy of the other side of a cover, postal stationery item or document, reduce the size to 75% or less of the
original and apply this to both colour and black and white copies;
- always state “a reduced copy at [xx]%” and this may be as small as 50% - state the
percentage to avoid confusion;
- for postmarks, where just the postmark is being copied, a full size copy is probably
acceptable provided it is shown apart from the original [i.e. it is clearly seen to be
a copy];
- for stamps, you may wish to enlarge all or part of the design and for this the copy
must be enlarged 125% or more - again, state the
“enlarged copy at [xx]%”;
- when stating the item is a reduced or enlarged copy it is better if this is in smaller
type - it is clearly stated but does not detract from the main text on the page.
These are only suggestions - what you do is your choice but remember photocopies and other
reproductions MUST NOT BE CONFUSED with the original material and follow the rules.
4. References in the Rules
Only two of the FIP classes, Postal History and Aerophilately,
refer to the size of copies. In both cases it is to coloured copies and these must be
at least 25% different in size. While it might be presumed black and white copies can be
full size and be legal it is not a good idea.
In New Zealand, the Social Class requires any colour copies to be 25% different in size
and the Polar Class all photocopies are to be 25% different in size.
While the other classes may be silent on this issue if you must use a photocopy or
other reproduction it is suggested you follow the “at least 25% different in
size” rule for colour and black and white copies.